Prince Harry has suffered a setback in his libel case against Associated Newspapers Ltd (ANL) as a judge ruled against his attempt to have part of the Mail on Sunday publisher's defence dismissed. The Duke of Sussex is suing ANL over a 2022 article related to a dispute over his UK security arrangements. The prince claims that the article falsely implied he had lied and attempted to manipulate public opinion.
Sir James Dyson's libel claim against the Daily Mirror's publisher, Mirror Group Newspapers (MGN), has been dismissed by Mr. Justice Jay. The legal action stemmed from an article published in January 2022, which Dyson deemed a personal attack on his lifetime achievements. In the two-day trial, Justin Rushbrooke KC, representing Sir James, argued that the article constituted an unjustified slur on his reputation, both personally and professionally. The piece, written by Brian Reade, referred to Dyson as the "vacuum-cleaner tycoon" who championed Vote Leave and later relocated his global head office to Singapore. The court, however, sided with MGN, asserting that Sir James failed to demonstrate financial loss or harm to his philanthropic work.
The High Court libel trial is a formidable battlefield where reputations hang in the balance. It requires unwavering determination, immense courage, and a strong belief in justice. Coleen Rooney, a prominent figure embroiled in a recent high-profile case, caused a stir when she revealed her contemplation of quitting the trial. In this blog post, we delve into the reasons behind Rooney's near-exit and gain insights into the challenges faced in such legal proceedings.